Friday, October 11, 2013

Astronomer Biography Quarter 1: Pierre Gassendi


Pierre Gassendi was a seventeenth-century French philosopher, scientist, and astronomer. He was born on January 22, 1592 in the South of France, to a poor family. He developed a clear adeptness for academics in his early life and went on to study at the most sophisticated schools in France when he was only just a teenager. As he grew older, he began branching out with careers, becoming a professor at Digne and getting his doctorate in theology, and ended up joining the Catholic Church as a priest.

His occupation as a priest is actually rather ironic, as later in life most of his published findings were those which opposed the general beliefs of the Church at that time. His research actually supported the views of Johannes Kepler, but Gassendi was careful to make sure his works did not obviously show this, or show that he rejected most of the Copernican beliefs. He mainly practiced experimental astronomy, and his studies reflected that he researched based on a heliocentric view of the universe. However, since the heliocentric idea was not accepted by the church at the time, Gassendi made sure not to include in his works that he supported this view because of the empirical astronomy he practiced. So needless to say, Gassendi was in a complicated situation, wanting to post his full research but not wanting to go against the church that he was so dedicated to.

Pierre Gassendi conducted several astronomical experiments. He liked to spend most of his time observing the sky, possibly even with telescope lenses personally given to him by Galileo.  And like Galileo himself, Gassendi recorded lengthy observations to benefit him in his studies. One of Gassendi’s most important discoveries was his 1631 observation of the transit of Mercury over the sun. With this observation, and the help of two small solar scales, Gassendi was able to estimate the diameter of Mercury, which he assumed to be around twenty arc seconds. This discovery turned out to be fairly controversial among other scientists at the time, because Gassendi’s estimate was much smaller than anyone had expected. Not only did it cause commotion from its size, but his discovery also provided support for Kepler’s law of planetary motion—the first known confirmation of this law, in fact. Other planetary calculations that Gassendi made include finding out how to determine longitude through reference to lunar eclipses. These important discoveries led to the eventual calculations of the distances between planets and the Sun.
 Another discovery he made was an observation of colorful lights in the sky, which he named “aurora borealis.” He studied and discovered the cause of this occurrence—it was a high altitude reflection of sunlight on ice crystals. This realization is important because even though it was uncovered by Gassendi in 1621, it was still proven to be correct two centuries later.
Pierre Gassendi also did a lot of work in the field of optics, between studying both vision and light. He and his partner Peiresc were confused with the idea of inverted images, and concluded that the retina must act as a mirror, which takes an upside-down, backwards picture and reflects it into the picture that is actually viewed through the eyes. In addition, in 1642 Gassendi decided to attempt to explain the visually perceptible variations of the size of the moon and sun at certain times of the day and night. He concluded it to the interaction of light behavior and the workings of the human eye, with respect to the visual experience produced by different kinds of light.

Pierre Gassendi died on October 24, 1655, in Paris. He was certainly one of the most controversial philosophers and astronomers in the seventeenth century. He studied celestial motions that differed what the Catholic Church was teaching, yet firmly stood by the Church and tried not to make his views appear to be sacrilegious. He made many important observations and discoveries that created a basis for later astronomers’ discoveries. Many of his findings are still relevant today. 

No comments:

Post a Comment